We are all “Politically Correct” Now

We are all “politically correct” now, if I can barrow Nixon. We’ve internalized Gramsci, even Christians.

There’s a push against PC, but, unfortunately, dominated by the juvenile antics of a Milo and the President. They strive for offense and not to strike at the root. The real perniciousness of political correctness is greater than a shock jocks antics because it makes issues and ideas untouchables.

My first conscious memory of political correctness was Dan Quail and Murphy Brown in the early 90’s. Remember that? I barely remember the details, but remember thinking the VP’s position was common sense. A child needs to be raised by a man and woman, a husband and wife (a sign I’ve internalized the enemies philosophy, I hedge to mention it because it might offend single moms, fatherless children, and dad’s plagued by guilt or loss).

In the early 90’s, at least in my personal memory, “pc” took fatherlessness off the discussion table. After all, what are *you* saying about the kids? What are *you* saying about moms? And how do you address this politically?

To address the family, divorce, and sex you strike at men, women, children, and all of society. The issue becomes your bigotry & intolerance of the difficulties or personal decisions of others. The problem isn’t fatherlessness, but your judgey social construct that attaches stigma to the choices of dad, mom, and the child, and who are you to judge? You are then chased off with issues of patriarchy, privilege, dominance, power, etc., and whatever other pc buzzword hold rhetorical force. It’s rhetorically powerful.

This made me realize the things that plague our culture are all intertwined and therefore can only be discussed in the context of the Logos. It is inescapable that fatherlessness is intertwined with feminism, “my body, my choice,” juvenile crime, homelessness, and, yes, school shootings. The secular humanist cannot grant this because it’s the close of their system. It’s the end of social autonomy as they know it. So, instead of talking about systemic issues, they’ve attached . The problem isn’t fatherlessness, but patriarchy – we don’t need men! And then they’ll compassionately offer government programs for their private choices to keep their sexual freedom, even if it means a loss of freedom for others. After all, should a child suffer because of the choices of the parent? “My body, my choice” doesn’t occur in a vacuum. Yet, we’ve embraced a culture that achieves this en masse.

What’s the point? America seeks to make male/female completely autonomous from one another, rebelling against nature and nature’s God, the Logos. The future is not woman. It is male and female (that binary) – for man came from woman and woman from man! We (and our children) need one another.

When we rip apart the one flesh sexual union, we reap what we sow. Can you rip apart your body & soul and still have life? “Why do you care what I do in the bedroom?” Because the social costs are radical, and you know it! That’s why you spend so much time making it a public issue. If you rip apart the one flesh of male/female in marriage, you literally rip apart children, families, love, and the “safe space” so many desire. As it is written, “what God has joined together, let no man put asunder.” Yet, we are hellbent on putting this asunder and can’t fathom what’s wrong?

The State will gladly be the father to the fatherless. Christian, why do you think true religion looks after the orphaned and the widowed? Why do you think the humanist spends so much time advocating for the State to look after the orphaned and the widowed? It’s religion all the way down!

Yet, the painful reality of wrecked marriages/fatherlessness is due to lust, lying, greed, etc., so even fatherlessness is a more deeply embedded problem than the State can fully address. This is why it doesn’t make good politics. It’s not immediate enough.

This is where Kingdom work needs to be seen for and it is – slow, even imperceptible at times. It doesn’t look like our prayers, evangelism, and church services do anything. So, instead of serving the Logos, we are tempted to leave it & want something more revolutionary – a sexual revolution, a social revolution, a political revolution, theological revolution, etc.

The Christian response is simple (doesn’t mean it’s simplistic): The way forward begins with “repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ! God has sent him to bless you by turning you away from your wickedness!” For the man suffering under the shame and guilt of his infidelity, greed, and divorce, there is grace and mercy, and this grace and mercy restores you to exercise dominion at work, in your home, and in your personal life. In short, “act like men, be strong.” Not governed by your passions, but governed by love (that term appropriated by the enemy) and governed by the Logos.

That’s the Christian way forward to the good of the city and nation. It doesn’t make for good public rallies or CNN town halls, but it’s the way forward.

Come and see!


Digital Dangers

In a post titled “The Dangers of Digital Babylon (1)”, Dr. David Murray challenges readers that “If we want to grow in grace and in the knowledge of Jesus Christ, we must grow in digital self-discipline.” Murray continues, “I’m 100% convinced that there’s nothing more important for individual Christians than to get digital technology under control. I really mean that. This is going to make or break our Christian lives, our families, and our churches for decades to come.” Murray has since followed up with multiple posts on how technology is killing our mindsour health, our relationships, and our productivity.  There is a lot of practical wisdom in these posts.



Mammon and Amen

A Lord’s Supper Meditation

Luke 16:1-18

Etymologically the word mammon and amen come from the same root. Mammon is the thing in which you place your trust and security, for many it is money. In the parable in Luke 16 mammon is money, that which we think will secure or future. This is, of course, idolatry. We trust the gift rather than the Giver. We trust the created thing rather than the Creator.

At the Table we find God’s promise to us that He is more trustworthy than mammon. Money, and created things, are fleeting and unstable, but the body and blood of Christ reaffirm God’s everlasting promise that He will never leave you nor forsake you.

Rather than finding hope and security in mammon, our only hope is in the Name of Jesus, the Name in which we pronounce our Amen.